简介：改编自蕾拉·斯利玛尼同名小说《温柔之歌》。　　米莉亚姆生育两个孩子之后，再也无法忍受平庸而琐碎的家庭主妇生活，她和丈夫保罗决定雇佣一个保姆，路易丝就这样进入了他们的生活。路易丝无所不能、近乎完美，米莉亚姆夫妇总是骄傲地向别人介绍：“我家的保姆是个仙女。”随着相互依赖的加深，隔阂与悲剧也在缓缓发酵。

简介：一次偶然中，保罗（Jérôme Robart 饰）结识了名叫弗雷德里克（路易斯·加瑞尔 Louis Garrel 饰）的画家，两人很快就成为了朋友。在弗雷德里克的家里，保罗遇见了女演员安格丽（莫妮卡·贝鲁奇 Monica Bellucci 饰），安格丽的美艳和奔放瞬间吸引了保罗的注意，保罗很快就坠入了爱河不能自拔。　　为了追随安格丽，保罗跟随她来到了意大利，在这里，保罗成为了安格丽的同行，但是，初来乍到的他只能做群众演员。在工作中，保罗遇见了他的同行伊莉莎白（席琳·萨莱特 Céline Sallette 饰），两人一见如故。弗雷德里克邀请保罗到罗马游玩，保罗带上了伊莉莎白，一段复杂而换乱的感情关系就此展开。

简介：获奖：2003年布宜诺斯艾利斯独立电影节最佳电影　　2003年戛纳影展法国文化奖年度最佳外国导演　　2003年戛纳影展“一种注目”最佳电影　　介绍：在广阔的毛里塔尼亚沙漠的边缘座落着一个叫Nouadhibou的临海小镇。在那儿，17岁的阿布达拉在移居欧洲前准备去探望母亲。这位忧郁的年轻人觉得自己在家乡格格不入；不会说当地语言；躲避乡村的风俗习惯和传统节日；相比传统服饰，他更喜欢最新的欧洲款式。但是阿布达拉还是融入到这片陌生的环境和当地居民的生活当中。他遇上忧伤而魅惑的娜娜；年长的巧手工玛塔；还有浓眉大眼的乐观小孤儿卡特拉。导演这部充满诗意，摄影优美的电影细致地观察并尖锐地对发展和传统之间的冲突做出尖锐的分析。

简介：故事说的是一对在杂耍剧院表演的贫穷夫妇，男的生性嫉妒；女的却又偏怀野心，经常梦想着一天能出人头地。一次有位富商邀请该女子去拍电影，实质上想暗中勾引她；丈夫得知后妒火顿生，便痛斥富商的淫亵，扬言要杀掉富商解气。谁知就在他尚未动手之际，富商却已遭人暗杀，丈夫由此惹上官司。这对落难鸳鸯又该如何脱身？

简介：英国作家詹姆斯·米勒（威廉·施梅尔 William Shimell 饰）来到意大利城市托斯卡纳为新作《合法副本》举办讲座。他与读者讨论书中的观点：关于艺术创作真实性的议论是毫无必要的，因为复制品本身即是原作，原作也是由其他作品复制而来。一个做古董买卖的法国女人（朱丽叶· 比诺什 Juliette Binoche 饰）带着11岁的儿子参与了讨论会，想为刚买的书索要签名。中途因为儿子饿了她提前离开，临走时留下了一个电话号码。　　米勒和女人在她的古董店再次相遇，他们驱车去郊外看一样东西。她开着车载着米勒无目的游荡，谈论书的主题，参观博物馆，谈论她叛逆的儿子，两人一路上争吵不休。在一个咖啡馆，女老板以为米勒是女人的丈夫，就开始和她围绕米勒讨论起婚姻。于是他们将错就错，米勒开始扮演女人的丈夫，两人约会，去宾馆。但是副本只是复制，而非原作，米勒结束复制身份，独自离开了郊外。　　比诺什凭借此片获得第63届戛纳电影节主竞赛单元最佳女演员奖。

简介：Claudie, a young French woman, inherits her uncle's property in Algeria, much to the disappointment of her scheming cousins Diane and Manuel. On the ferry she meets and falls for Pierre, an idle young man who has squandered his inheritance and is on his way to beg from Christian, his rich but rough-and-ready uncle, who owns a neighbouring farm to Claudie's. Made to work on the farm by Christian as a loan condition, Pierre is soon a changed man, and proposes to Claudie. But when his Arab friend Zoubir invites the Europeans on a hunting party, Diane and Manuel see their chance to move against their cousin.

简介：倒楣男子傅根在路邊發現一具屍體，到警局報案協助調查，不料竟成為兇案主嫌，吹毛求疵的警探不肯放過任何一個細節，逼得傅根只好不斷回想，將那晚發生的雞毛蒜皮小事都一五一十地娓娓道來。漫漫長夜，偵查持續進行，但各種意想不到的荒謬怪事，卻在警局接連發生，眼見不為憑，揪竟警探是否能一窺真相天機？　　法國荒誕喜劇奇才昆汀杜皮爾繼《超能輪胎殺人事件》等片後再次出招，這次與比利時影帝貝諾特波爾沃爾德聯手出擊，大玩觀點敘事手法，顛覆觀眾對類型的預期心理，開創懸疑風意識流黑色喜劇。超現實元素不斷侵襲電影中的故事空間，還來不及困惑，幽默嘲諷的對白又適時笑岔出題。在有限空間中，演員表演激盪火花，不到電影最後一刻，絕對猜不透它的最後一張底牌。

简介：居住在法国北部城镇的弗莱迪（David Douche 饰）是一个无所事事的青年，他的母亲靠经营小餐馆为生，母亲的溺爱让弗莱迪根本不去考虑未来。他或者和三五好友骑着摩托车招摇过市，或者和女友玛莉（Marjorie Cottreel 饰）纵情享受与水之欢。在这个平静得近乎无聊的小镇，甚至死亡也无法激起太多涟漪。然而，一些阿拉伯移民却改变了弗莱迪的生活轨迹。张扬倔强的阿拉伯青年卡德（Kader Chaatouf 饰）主动向玛莉搭讪，这引起弗莱迪一伙强烈的不满……　　本片荣获1997年英国电影学院萨瑟兰郡奖、1997年戛纳电影节金相机奖特别提及、1997年芝加哥国际电影节国际影评人费比西奖、1997年欧洲电影节欧洲年度发现、1997年让维果最佳影片奖、1997年圣保罗国际电影节评委会奖。

简介：一战前，德国人祖（奥斯卡·威内尔 Oskar Werner 饰）和法国人占（亨利·赛尔 Henri Serre饰）在巴黎结识。他们意趣相投，对诗歌和小说都有强烈而共同的兴趣，甚至二人为着同一个雕塑也着迷。顺理成章地，祖与占都爱上了同一个女子：聪明貌美的凯瑟琳（让娜·莫罗 Jeanne Moreau饰）。　　在这样的关系中，占选择了成全温柔单纯的祖。他们一起到乡间度假，度过了美妙时光。然而一战的爆发，却让他们失去了联系，在自己国家服役期间，他们多么担心会在战场上杀死自己的好友。而祖，从不间断地给妻子凯瑟琳写信。　　战争结束，祖与占再次相遇，占觉察到祖和凯瑟琳的关系很糟糕——她对婚姻以外的感情从没停止过追逐，喜欢在各种爱情关系中享受自由。占在祖家中住下，凯瑟琳毫不掩饰对占的爱，这段三角关系平衡而快乐的维系着，旁人完全看不透。当占要离去时，凯瑟琳直率锐利的性格让事情起了变化……

简介：法国励志小品喜剧，抗癌成功的露西过得并不好，乳癌的经历让她失去尊严，不知道这样活下来的自己还有谁愿意在乎。一位活泼外向的舞蹈老师说服露西参加他专为乳癌患者开立的舞蹈课程，这个课程的成果发表必须公开展现自己的裸体。这个惊奇的挑战，却带领著她逐步走出伤痛，重新坦然面对自己及身旁的人。挑战世俗 对女性之美的标准，让女人用更正面的眼光看待身体，获得自信与美丽的励志小品。

简介：一个十岁的小女孩（贝蒂•若耶-布萝BertilleNoël-Bruneau饰）在上学路上碰见了一只正抓田鼠的狐aaa。女孩被漂亮的狐狸迷住，下学后回到森林原地希望再见到那只狐狸。从秋天到冬天，女孩在厚雪地里沿着狐狸的脚印寻找，却失足摔断了腿，整个冬天只好在室内度过，读了很多关于狐狸的书。春天是猎狐的季节，为狐狸忧心忡忡的小女孩欣喜若狂的发现了狐狸的洞穴和它的三只小狐狸，却没想到狐狸嗅出人的气味，连夜转移了幼崽。女孩决定不去打扰狐狸，而是坐到山毛榉树上等它主动出现。就这样，人与狐狸的关系慢慢建立，狐狸带着小女孩展开了奇妙的森林冒险……r本片的驯兽师是法国的玛丽诺耶•布拉妮（Marie-NoëlleBaroni），片中出现的六只狐狸及其他多数动物都来自于她的农场。

简介：A Parisian museum director believes his wife has lost interest in him and so places a poisoned cigarette in the box on his desk - thus allowing chance to decide the moment of his death.

简介：菲利普三十岁，发现自己已经开始脱发。这位晚熟的音乐家，觉得脱发是一件非同小可的灾难。皮肤科医生告诉他，惟有他的父亲能告诉他，还剩下多长时间会秃顶：似乎每个家庭的男人，秃顶的年龄都一样。菲利普于是回到故乡，想知道父亲彻底秃顶的年龄——也就是他自己的。

简介：法国导演弗朗索瓦·欧容在沉寂两年后，终于带着皮埃尔·尼内、葆拉·贝尔主演的《弗兰兹》杀回影坛。影片将以一战后的法国为背景，聚焦贝尔饰演的德国女人正因未婚夫的惨死而悲痛欲绝，尼内饰演的神秘法国男子却悄然出现，默默为其未婚夫墓碑致哀、献花，两人也就此揭开一段匪夷所思的往事。

简介：法国导演维达尔想重拍一部默片时代的吸血鬼影片。看过香港电影《东方三侠》后决定启用其中的女主演张曼玉。张到法国后只能用英语与周遭的人沟通，所以拍摄过程很不顺利。这其间，大家都在议论张与服装师的异常关系，制片人也开始怀疑导演维达尔的能力和动机。有一天，导演在看完刚拍完的镜头后突然出现精神不正常的状况，制片人终于要决心撤换导演和女主演......《伊》片以戏中戏的形式展开，以虚实结合的手法表现一部影片在拍摄过程中台前幕后的种种状况，探讨人与艺术，即现实与梦幻扑朔迷离的联系。

简介：Far’Hook is a 20-year-old rapper. Following a violent dispute with a rival, he’s forced to leave Paris for a while. His producer, Bilal, suggests that Far’Hook acts as driver for Bilal’s father, Serge, on a tour of French ports, following in the footsteps of the classic painter Joseph Vernet.　　Despite the age gap and culture clash, an unlikely friendship forms between this talented rapper and a bricklayer from the north of France during a road trip that concludes in Marseille for a final concert, one of reconciliation.

简介：法国独立制片公司Gaumont将拍一部关于席琳·迪翁的电影《爱的力量》(The Power of Love)，成本2300万美元，影片将会出现多首迪翁的经典歌曲，包括“All by Myself”、“My Heart Will Go On”、“I’m Alive”等。　　瓦莱丽·勒梅西埃(《巴黎淘气帮》《五月傻瓜》)执导，她也将饰演迪翁。影片记录迪翁从60年代在魁北克出生、成长，到十几岁时声名鹊起，再到她与经纪人、丈夫Rene Angelil以及家人的关系。法国2020年12月2日上映。

简介：1942年，11岁的小约瑟夫（约瑟夫·魏斯曼 Joseph Weismann 饰）正是天真烂漫的年纪。盛夏六月的一个清晨，小约瑟夫穿着一件胸口缝着黄色小星星的衣服，正要兴致冲冲地去上学。旧货商邻居鼓励他好好上课，而面包师傅却开他玩笑。他的犹太小伙伴和他的家人在蒙马特高地学习和生活。即使这是块被占领的法国区域，他们仍然得到了暂时的庇护。然而这短暂的幸福和宁静，很快就崩塌了。　　1942年7月16日早上，在埃菲尔铁塔附近的冬季自行车赛车场里，一万三千名受害者被凶残的虏获在一起，准备运往波纳·拉·罗兰德集中营。影片根据真实事件改编而成。

简介：法塔（法萨·布亚梅 Fatsah Bouyahmed 饰）是一位生活在阿尔及利亚的淳朴农民，他生命中最珍贵的东西，就是他所饲养的母牛雅克林娜，法塔的梦想就是能够带着雅克林娜去参加一年一度在巴黎举办的农业会展。这一年，法塔终于收到了自己梦寐以求的邀请函，但是他的妻子娜依玛（哈吉尔·玛斯都基 Hajar Masdouki 饰）并不赞同丈夫的决定。　　倔强的法塔牵着雅克林娜，毅然决然的踏上了前往巴黎的旅途。因为经费紧张，法塔决定先乘船前往马赛，然后从那里步行抵达巴黎，一路上，法塔遇见了各种各样的意外，而他和娜依玛之间的感情，也经历了重重的考验。

简介：Pierre Lachenay（让·德赛利 Jean Desailly 饰)是一个已婚的作家和杂志主编，在一次出差时，他被美丽的空姐 Nicole（弗朗索瓦·朵列 Françoise Dorléac 饰）所吸引。碰巧的是，两人竟在同一间酒店见面了。Pierre邀请Ni cole出去喝东西，两人聊了一夜，不久，两人便爱得无法自拔。Pierre要回巴黎了，Nicole在他的本子上留了电话号码。回到家的Pierre瞒着妻子Franca (Nelly Benedetti 饰)偷偷和Nicole联系。他更主动申请出差去Reims，只为了能带上Nicole，暂时远离他的妻子和女儿。在Reims，Pierre为了讲座忙得不可开交，和Nicole闹了矛盾，两人提前离开了Reims。碰巧Pierre的妻子打电话到Reims，发现Pierre已经离开，开始怀疑Pierre。后来，Nicole厌倦了这段关系，离开了Pierre。而另一边，Franca则准备和Pierre离婚。直到Franca发现了Pierre和Nicole的亲密合照，愤怒和嫉妒促使她拿出猎枪，走到街上去寻找Pierre，以了结这一切......

简介：十七岁的查理（Joséphine Japy 饰）乖巧懂事，是个十分讨人喜欢的女孩，和大部分同龄的姑娘们一样，查理对未来充满了美好而又光明的幻想。莎拉（Lou de Laâge 饰）满头金发，走在校园里十分惹眼，而她的性格和她的发色一样张扬而高调，萨拉向往无拘无束的自由生活，几乎就是循规蹈矩墨守成规的查理的对照面。　　在充满了青春活力的校园中，这两个个性截然相反的女孩相遇了，只一眼，查理就被奔放开朗的萨拉给深深吸引。随着时间的推移，两人越走越近，最终成为了无话不谈的闺中密友，然而，交往的深入带来的却是友情的裂痕，无论是查理或是莎拉，都无法阻止这裂痕越来越大。

简介：艾莉克西亚（阿加莎·罗塞勒 Agathe Rousselle 饰）是一名汽车模特，拥有曼妙身材的她靠着跳艳舞维持生计。早年间，一场车祸让艾莉克西亚的大脑中被医生植入了钛金属，这块金属随着时间的推移，渐渐影响了她的性格，让她变得暴戾而又狂躁，在钛金属的影响下，她甚至杀死了自己的双亲。不仅如此，艾莉克西亚还发现自己对汽车产生了性趣，在和汽车发生了性关系后，艾莉克西亚发现自己的身体逐渐出现了妊娠的征兆。　　文森特（文森特·林顿 Vincent Lindon 饰）是消防队的队长，早年间，他的儿子失踪了，这些年来，他一直都没有放弃过寻找儿子的下落。命运让艾莉克西亚和文森特相遇了，艾莉克西亚女扮男装，假装成为文森特的儿子，和文森特开始了住在同一屋檐下的生活。她一边要努力维系自己的谎言不被戳穿，一遍还要隐藏渐渐变形的身体。当然，纸是包不住火的，在长久的压抑之后，艾莉克西亚和文森特之间的关系也发生了微妙的变化。

简介：十岁的汤姆和父亲住在一个贫穷但温馨幸福的集装箱里，他在学校表现良好，平凡的生活却因为一个儿童保护工作者的介入而发生了变化。影片讨论了关于贫困户是否有能力抚养小孩的社会问题，

简介：Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.　　These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.　　Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...　　Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...�　　Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.　　Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.　　Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.　　Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.　　Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.　　Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.　　Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.　　Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.　　Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.　　Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.　　Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.　　Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept　　Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.　　Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.　　Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.　　Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.　　Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.　　Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.